rss feed button

Anti-Depressants can Increase Breast Cancer Recurrence

June 23rd, 2009

breast cancer

Tamoxifen is a widely-used breast cancer drug which 500,000 women in the United States are taking to prevent their estrogen-dependent breast cancer from recurring. The FDA plans to warn doctors about a recent breakthrough in which evidence has been gathered about the interaction between tamoxifen and antidepressants. Certain anti-depressants, when taken with tamoxifen can actually increase a women’s risk of breast cancer recurrence by two-fold.

The study used to discover these findings involved 1300 women over a one year period of time. All the women were monitored, their breast cancer recurrence rates were compared in different groups of women taking no antidepressants, Zoloft, Paxil, and Prozac all along with tamoxifen. The results yielded a 7.5% recurrence rate for women not taking antidepressants and a recurrence rate of 16% for women taking any of the 3 mentioned types of antidepressants. Other antidepressants studied that did not significantly affect breast cancer recurrence rate were Luvox, Celexa, and Lexapro.

Now that the FDA has proof through clinical outcomes that this drug interaction can actually increase a women’s risk of recurring cancer, the FDA is opting to add information to tamoxifen’s label.  Although placing information on FDA-approved labels is a start to informing health care providers and patients about this drug interaction, further vehicles will be needed to educate the breast cancer survivor community on this issue.

Medco’s cheif medical officer, Robert Epstein, explained that over 500,000 U.S. women are taking tamoxifen, of which 30% are simultaniously perscribed antidepressants.  This indicates that many health care providers are not aware of this dangerous interaction, so patient awareness is key, especially for patients treated by multiple doctors.

This article was written by Amy Shah, however facts were obtained from an article by Jennifer Corbett Dooren.

How to Live With a Pacemaker

March 23rd, 2009

Pacemaker

There are times when it boggles the mind to just think of the advances we have made in the fields of medicine and technology. The pacemaker is a pretty simple device, but it makes a world of difference to many people who depend on it for their lives. If you have been fitted with one of these medical devices, there are certain basic precautions that you must follow if you want them to function properly and safely.

•    Carry a pacemaker ID, preferably on a bracelet or necklace, to inform those around you

•    Inform medical personnel at your workplace that you have a pacemaker

•    Tell doctors about your device before you undergo any invasive surgical procedure

•    Be careful around machines that have large magnetic fields, like MRI scan units

•    Stay away from machinery that uses high voltage or radar

•    There’s no need to worry about the effects of common household appliances like refrigerators, televisions, washing machines and cell phones, however you do need to keep your cell phones and other gadgets away from your pacemaker area, it’s preferable not to keep them in your shirt pocket

•    MP3 headphones have been known to cause a certain amount of interference, so it’s best not to use them at all

•    If there is any thought that an external device is causing the pacemaker to function erratically, move away from the device and wait for your heartbeat to return to normal

•    Talk to your doctor about exercising moderately, but be cautious of injuries that directly injure your chest, especially blows to the area that houses the pacemaker, this may affect the way your device functions, so if you are hit in your thoracic region, consult your doctor immediately

•    Get regular check-ups on your pacemaker by a doctor to ensure that it is working as it should

•    Ensure that the battery, lead wire and other aspects of the device are in good condition

•    The pacemaker’s battery generally lasts for around 7 or 8 years

•    Get the pacemaker replaced once in 10 years or so

•    The pacemaker may contain either a chemical or nuclear power source and for nuclear power sources,  dispose of the battery with care once the pacemaker has reached the end of its life

•    If you’re unsure or worried about any aspect of your pacemaker, contact your cardiologist immediately

This article is contributed by Sarah Scrafford, who regularly writes on the topic of ultrasound technician school. She invites your questions, comments and freelancing job inquiries at her email address: sarah.scrafford25@gmail.com

Image via http://mykentuckyheart.com/

Mutation Responsible for Cancer Progression

February 27th, 2009

Natural Genetics just published the discovery of a mutation responsible for the progression of cancer.  This finding has the potential to help treat against numerous types of cancers since the mutation can be linked to various types of malignancies, rather than just in one type of cancer like many previous discoveries.

This mutation was discovered through the study of MicroRNAs (miRNAs).  Normally, the data stored in DNA is translated into RNA and the RNA is then translated into proteins, which then regulates gene expression.  In this study, the small pieces of RNA, miRNAs, were found to be blocking their translation into corresponding proteins.  Some of the miRNAs are hypothesized to suppress tumor formation and it was found that unusual levels of these molecules were present in all cancers studied.  This implies that this type of mutation could be responsible for cancer growth and progression in all types of cancers.  Following this hypothesis, continued research could possibly lead to a therapy that could reverse abnormal miRNA levels to treat multiple types of cancer.  The scientists working on this project believe that they could lead to an incredible discovery in cancer treatment.

Moving forward with the research, Sonia Melo is planning to analyze 12 different types of cancer in search of mutations in the pathway of miRNA formation.  In preliminary studies, she and her team found a protein called TARP2 that caused mutations in the pathway of miRNA formation, leading to low amounts of miRNA.  Upon the discovery of this protein and its pathway, the team later found that when functional TARBP2 was introduced to those cancerous cells, the miRNA returned to its normal levels.  In turn, those normal levels of miRNA that were reintroduced into the cancerous cells suggested to initiate tumor suppression functions.  This was found by comparing the levels of several known oncoproteins that promote tumorous functions when activated.

In vivo studies were performed by Melo and her team to verify their findings in SCID mice.  The team injected SCID some mice with new TARBP2 cells and other SCID mice with old TARBP2 from mutated cancer cells and compared the two groups.  The first group of mice with new TARBP2 cells either didn’t form tumors or formed a negligible amount of cancerous cells, while the second group of mice with old TARBP2 cells formed tumors relatively quickly.  This result confirmed the group’s theory that aberrant TARBP2 promotes tumor growth by reducing the amount of miRNA in cells.

A TARBP2 mutation in human cancer impairs microRNA processing and DICER1 function

The Basics of Heart Failure

December 2nd, 2008

Heart failure (HF) is a condition in which the heart’s ability to fill or pump a adequate amount of blood is impaired. It can be caused by a number of factors including hypertension (high blood pressure), valve failure, coronary artery disease, and many more things. In the figure below, heart failure is shown to be caused by thickened myocardium (myocarditis), which may be a direct result of a viral infection that can cause the muscle to become inflamed. Almost 2% of the American population has heart failure and even with the best therapy, HF still has an annual mortality of 10%.

heart-failure.jpeg

Treatment of HF depends on the stage of the disease’s progression and is rated on a scale from case I to case IV. The five year survival rate of patients in stage IV is only 20%, therefore this is considered severe heart failure. There are several minimally invasive devices used in HF treatment. The most common treatment device is an artificial pacemaker (shown below), which successfully prevents about 50% of all heart failures from re-occurring. Another treatment option for HF that is extreme is a heart transplant. This is called the “Gold Standard” treatment because it is the best to use, however the availability of donors is slowly declining while the number of patients who need a transplant is steadily rising. Only about 2200 heart transplants are preformed every year.

pacemaker.jpg

The ideal solution would be an artificial heart…In 1985, at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), the first artificial heart was implanted. Five years later, UPMC was the first medical institution to release a patient with a ventricular-assist device (VAD) (shown below). Today, VADs called positive displacement pumps are the leading treatment therapy for HF patients. Dr. Marc Simon presented the idea of positive displacement pumps at the BMES Conference and spoke of future improvement for these devices. He announced that second and third generation prototypes are currently underway in many institutions and will be ready for release soon. Dr. Simon discussed that there is an ideal period during HF in which it is ideal to implant there devices into the patient in order to maximize recovery success. There is a certain point in HF in which an acute, catastrophic event leads to sudden progression of the disease, eventually leading the patient to death. The closer researchers are able to pinpoint the time immediately prior to this turn of events to implant the device, the greater the patient’s chances are for survival.

ventricular-assist-device.jpeg

-Amy

Chemotherapy Effects on Different Cancer Patients

September 25th, 2008

Chemotherapy is any treatment that utilizes the use of chemicals to stop cancer cells from continuing to flourish.  This type of treatment is used on 50% of all people diagnosed with cancer.  It can eliminate cancer cells that have been metastasized as well. Chemotherapy has saved millions of peoples lives, but it doesn’t save every cancer patient.

Chemotherapy works wonders for some people and not at all for others.  The cause of this was not known until recently when the Center for Environmental Health Sciences (CEHS) and Departments of Biological Engineering and Biology from MIT discovered a group of 48 genes.  Several of these 48 genes have been linked to cancer, but what they all have in common is that they can all show how susceptible a patient is to MNNG, which is a DNA-damaging agent present in chemotherapeutic agents.

This lesion in the DNA causes DNA repair sequences to initiate in an attempt to save the DNA.

This lesion in the DNA causes DNA repair sequences to initiate in an attempt to save the DNA.

MNNG induces unstoppable DNA damage by creating lesions in the DNA, thereby killing the cells.  Everyone’s DNA reacts to MNNG by attempting to repair itself, however some people’s DNA reacts more strongly while others’ reaction can be more passive.  Everyone’s DNA is so different that two seemingly equally healthy individuals were tested by MIT researchers and it was found that they could have completely different responses to the same chemotherapy treatment.

The MIT team continued with this research by measuring the expression of each of the 48 genes in every cell line.  They measured the sensitivity of each gene to MNNG several times and found they were 94% accutrate in their results.  They followed by measuring responses to other common chemotherapeutic toxic agents that are typically used to treat cancer patients.  They have discovered how and why different patients react differently to the same chemotherapy treatments.  This means that chemotherapy may not be the right cancer treatment for every patient, it depends on their genetic reactions to MNNG and other toxic agents.

What are Lasers?

March 4th, 2008

Laser is an acronym for “light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation”. A laser is a device that creates and amplifies a narrow, intense beam of coherent light. Atoms release radiation by absorbing photons when “excited” electrons emit light, then the atoms radiate their light in random directions. This results in incoherent light, which is a jumble of photons going in all directions. Lasers create coherent light from this by identifying the right atoms with the optimal internal storage mechanisms. Lasers create an environment in which those atoms can cooperate to give up their light at a coordinated time and direction (Bell Labs).

The basic unit of light from which this entire process begins is called a photon. A photon contains energy that can be calculated via the following equation:

Energy = h · c/λ

 

The energy of any type of light can be calculated by just knowing its wavelength because h is Plank’s constant (4.14×10-15 eV/s), c is the speed of light (3×1010 cm/s) and λ is the wavelength in centimeters. The wavelength of light can determine its color and affects the laser’s energy. Figure 1 below shows the light spectrum and how it relates to the types of light humans use for different medical applications (Dr. Michael Berns, Beckman Laser Institute, 2007).

light-spectrum.JPG

Figure 1: The figure above describes the different types of light and their associated wavelengths. Lasers generally exist in the infrared, visible, and ultraviolet wavelengths.

The use of lasers has revolutionized medicine because lasers are accurate, quick, and minimally invasive. Many different types of lasers exist and are FDA approved for various medical uses. There are six different types of laser-tissue interaction illustrated in figure 2. The accuracy of the laser assures that only the desired portion of a specimen is affected by the laser. The strength of the laser provides any medical treatment with adequate power to ablate the plaque, no matter how large the obstruction may be. The efficiency of the laser provides a better medical treatment because it takes less repetitions of the treatment to complete the procedure. There are many different types of lasers used in medicine today and they have diverse applications depending on their wavelength, absorption, strength, and accuracy (Dr. Michael Berns, Beckman Laser Institute, 2007).

laser-tissue-interactions.png

Figure 2: Of the six types of laser-tissue interaction illustrated above, each has a different function an medical application. For example, photoablation can be used to break apart hard particles while heat can be used to grow tissue and increase cell division (Dr. Michael Berns, Beckman Laser Institute, 2004).

National Engineers Week

February 13th, 2008

esc-e-week.jpg

February 17-23, 2008 is National Engineers Week, or E-week. This is a week in which people all over the nation hold events to strengthen the community’s understanding and awareness of engineering. It is also designed to encourage students to pursue careers in engineering and related technological fields to help advance the country.

E-week is celebrated everywhere and locations can be found at the National Engineers Week website.

I would like to promote E-week in California, USA. The Henry Samueli School of Engineering at the University of California, Irvine (UCI) is holding a giant celebration for E-week. Many events and competitions will be hosted by Engineering Student Council (ESC), which is an undergraduate organization that helps spread and promote engineering throughout the local community and mainly on the UCI campus. This year’s motto is “The Future is Not Written, it is Engineered”, and that couldn’t be more true. Everyone and anyone is welcome to al the events of E-week held on UC Irvine campus:

Tuesday, February 19

Dean’s Breakfast
Time: 9:30 AM to 11:30 AM
Location: Engineering Gateway (EG) Plaza

Wednesday, February 20

EngiTECH Career Fair
Time: 10:00 AM to 3:00 PM
Location: Engineering Tower / Computer Science Plaza

Pub Night
Time: 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM
Location: AntHill Pub

Thursday, February 21

High School Shadow Day
Time: 9:00 AM to 2:00 PM

E-Week BBQ
Time: 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM
Location: Engineering Gateway (EG) Plaza

Friday, February 22

E-Week Awards Banquet
Time: 6:30 PM to 9:30 PM
Location: University Club

Broomball!
Time: 12:00 AM - 2:00 AM (Friday night / early Saturday morning)
Location: Westminister Ice Arena

e-week-flyer-2008-final.jpg

There are many more competitions that have prizes! If you enter and win, you can get up to $500!!

To find your way around the UCI campus, here is a Campus Map.

logo-poster.jpg

There will be hundreds of people at the e-week events include UCI faculty, undergraduates, and graduate students as well as many company representatives and hiring managers from over 50 different technical companies both local and international. Please come out and enjoy the events, free food, and networking opportunities!

Glioblastoma Brain Cancer Treatment

January 22nd, 2008

Glioblastoma, with an average survival rate of only five years, is the most common and aggressive type of brain tumor. It affects over 50% of all brain tumor victims and is infamous for being highly resistant to traditional cancer therapies, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery. Dr. Gordon Gribble of Dartmouth College has lead a team of researchers to discovering a high performance compound that can kill 50% of glioblastoma cells at its lowest dosages. In experiments run so far, this recently patented drug can out-perform current anti-brain cancer drugs on the market such as Procarbazine, Nitrosourea, and Carmustine. This new drug has a cytotoxic effect on cancerous cells by binding tightly to their DNA and poisoning the cell through a process called bis-intercalation, in which the DNA is double-binded and the cell cannot replicate because its DNA fails to unravel (due to the double binding of the two strands of DNA).

bis-intercalation.jpg

The figure above shows a green molecule bis-intercalated to DNA.  This demonstrates how the nucleotides can adjust their bonding in reaction to a chemical reagent.

The researchers are continuing to perform in vitro studies on this anti-brain cancer drug with a partnership through PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc. (located in Princeton, NJ).

For more detailed information, please see PhytoMedical’s press release.

-Amy Shah

How Personalized Medicine Caters to YOU

December 7th, 2007

Often in medicine, a situation may occur in which two patients have identical medical history and receive the same prognosis and treatment plan, however one of the patients does not respond to treatment. Traditional medicine works like this with protocols to follow for every patient. This has been extremely successful in the past decades, however researchers have discovered a new approach to improve the success of medicine. Since genetic variation is extremely common and often affects how one’s body responds to medication and therapy, researchers are working on incorporating each patient’s individual genetic profile into their treatment plan. This is called personalized medicine, which is a method in which diagnosis and treatment of a medical condition is catered toward the particular patient’s genetic profile to compensate for metabolic differences, seemingly silent mutations, and inactive viruses. Thanks to recent scientific advances in genomics (specifically the Human Genome Project), personalized medicine has the potential to provide patients with more advanced diagnostic testing methods. The sequencing of the human genome has made it possible for researchers to link many diseases and treatments to certain genes. These scientific advances make it easier to map molecular pathways, treat disorders, and understand how medication interacts with the body, thereby improving treatment protocols.

Although the government provides some barriers for personalized medicine, the Department of Defense has allocated increasing amounts of funds ($ in millions) towards The Human Genome Project.  However, the majority of funding for the Human Genome Project research came from from NIH grants.

Figure 1: Although the government provides some barriers for personalized medicine, the Department of Defense has allocated increasing amounts of funds ($ in millions) towards The Human Genome Project. However, the majority of funding for the Human Genome Project research came from from NIH grants.

The majority of physicians prefer to stick to traditional trial-and-error medicine. Perhaps this is because of the great risk involved in trying new therapies when existing protocols are usually successful. Physicians who practice personalized medicine must create a unique treatment plan that takes into account the patient’s exceptional physiology, metabolism, and genome. Personalized medicine faces several boundaries, for example traditional physician practice, the pharmaceutical industry, the medical payment system and regulatory procedures. After personalized medicine can overcome these obstacles, much benefit prevails with this methodology such as saving more lives, reducing treatment costs, and improving patient recovery time through the accuracy, efficiency, safety, and speed that personalized medicine has to offer.

Obstacles of Personalized Medicine

Since personalized medicine is a new diagnostic approach that requires a good amount of training and studying to prevail in, there are many obstacles blocking its path to success. The most prominent barrier present is traditional trial-and-error medicine because it is extremely difficult to replace something that has been used for hundreds of years. Trial-and-error medicine has become a standard treatment process for doctors all over the world. It works in the sense that a patient presents typical symptoms, the physician provides a typical diagnosis, and then follows up with a typical treatment plan. When the treatment plan does not provide relief for the patient, the physician will go through this loop again and again until a diagnosis and treatment bring the patient back to being healthy. The problem with this type of protocol is that several treatments cost the patient more money and occupy an increasing amount of the patient’s time. The down-fall of this methodology is that the wrong treatment (although not occurring the majority of the time) can also lead to the patient becoming sicker, or even dying. One big reason for why physicians are not switching to personalized medicine is because many medical schools do not cover genomics and genetics completely in their curriculum, therefore graduating doctors may not understand the relevance and promise of incorporating their patient’s genome into their diagnosis. Personalized Medicine is very complicated and incorporates many specialties (figure 2) in order to serve the patient well, without a thorough education, physicians cannot be expected to take up this new protocol right away.

factors-of-personalized-medicine.jpg

Figure 2: Personalized Medicine is a complicated health care practice which utilizes many fields and specialties.

Another barrier in the way of personalized medicine is the pharmaceutical industry. This is a helpful industry that has lead medicine along its way throughout history, however the pharmaceutical field has created a habit often referred to as the “blockbuster drug” model. A “blockbuster drug” is a product that is capable of achieving sales over $1 billion annually. In order to achieve these results, the product must be in wide enough use to earn this much revenue (i.e. a large number of patients should be using the product). Many patients, although they are the minority, suffer from adverse effects of largely prescribed medication and this can often lead to death. If the number of dying patients is statistically insignificant when compared to the amount of patients with no complaints, the pharmaceutical industry considers the drug of product economically favorable and continues production and distribution. This explains the fact that pharmaceutical companies are most profitable when they treat large populations of people with a given disease because the most profits come to industry when there are more consumers. Personalized medicine clashes with the “blockbuster drug” model because it incorporates each and every patient’s needs into a particular treatment plan, hence a small group of patients with similar treatment needs may not be supported by the pharmaceutical industry. As for drugs that are linked to diagnostics, pharmaceutical companies run in the other direction in fright that this may complicate the market to physicians and slow the identification and treatment of patients.

The reimbursment system that exists today is also working against personalized medicine. Medicare, Medicaid, and health insurance companies cover the majority of medical costs. These reimbursement institutions provide financial support for each procedure conducted. Therefore, rather than spending time to correctly diagnose a patient, physicians are often pressed for time to squeeze as many procedures into their schedule as possible for the most economic gain. If companies develop new and improved diagnostic testing methods to help physicians more accurately diagnose their patients, perhaps physicians would be more likely to provide their patients with the proper treatment plan.

The most popularly despised barrier of personalized medicine is the world of regulatory affairs, referred to as the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in the United States. The current regulatory system is not economically feasible with the way that personalized medicine works, however the FDA is not in opposition to personalized medicine. Since clinical trials of drug-development costs are high, it takes much time to pass the safety and efficiency of new drugs. If a certain drug pertains to a small percentage of patients (as in personalized medicine), a clinical trial may not be cost effective enough to put that drug through the FDA process. In the FDA’s support of personalized medicine, Dr. Andrew Von Eschenbach, Director of the FDA, gave a briefing to the Personalized Medicine Coalition at the National Press Club. He announced that the FDA is working on ways to bring new testing and treatment methods to the molecularly-based market. On the other side of regulatory affairs lies the U.S. government. Despite what many citizens may think, the government is quite involved with this scientific advancement. Since very few genomics-based tests and treatments are available to consumers, government officials have been taking a stand to support personalized medicine. For example, Senator Barak Obama introduced the Genomics and Personalized Medicine Act to overcome scientific barriers by promoting medical advancements to regulatory obstacles. Mike Leavitt, United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, has created a committee called the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics Health and Society. A specific committee dedicated to updating government officials on genetic health and advancements is a big step in the direction of personalized medicine. Although regulatory obstacles do exist, there are also steps being taken to help medical advancement towards personalized medicine.
Advantages of Personalized Medicine

Patients with acute or fairly progressed diseases do not have the comfort of time that it takes for traditional trial-and-error medicine. If the first diagnosis and treatment plan doesn’t work, it may be too late to save the patient. As you can see in figure 3 below, symptoms progress and diseases worsen quickly and many patients don’t have the luxury of time that it takes for traditional medicine to treat them. By utilizing the patient’s unique genome and identifying which treatments are sure not to work, personalized medicine can save this patient much sooner than traditional medicine. If the patient is treated sooner, their bed and room in the hospital may open up in time to save another patient’s life. Saving time is crucial to the patient, the hospital, and physicians alike.

time.jpg

Figure 3: Shows the relationship and correlation between time, disease management of traditional trial-and-error medicine, and disease progression.

With that said, less treatment therapies used means less money spent. Personalized medicine has the potential to save each patient thousands of dollars. The FDA estimates that if diagnostic tests based on genomics were used on just the patients needing warfarin, the United States health care system could save as much as $1.1 billion dollars every year. These types of tests are currently available and can be used hand-in-hand with personalized medicine to refine each patient’s treatment plan; unfortunately these tests are underused. If each physician were to routinely utilize these diagnostic methods, they could save billions of dollars by just avoiding adverse patient reaction to the inaccurate treatment.

Researchers are currently trying to trace metabolic pathways, genetic variants, and treatment resistance in the human genome. Once each of the three are linked together, they will develop diagnostic tools for each situation. The advantages of personalized medicine are enormous, however there are many difficult road blocks to overcome before personalized medicine can hit the mainstream. The people fighting for personalized medicine, like the Personalized Medicine Coalition (PMC), need to work harder and faster to get it over the hurdles, but most of all they need more support. Personalized medicine is for YOU and you only, so do a little work for it.

For further information on Personalized Medicine: FUSE, Realizing the Promise of Personalized Medicine, MayoClinic, and Pharmacogenomics.

All About Atherosclerosis

November 5th, 2007

What is Atherosclerosis?
Atherosclerosis is a disease where lipoproteins, which are plasma proteins that carry triglycerides and cholesterol, collect on the inner wall of arterial blood vessels. It is a chronic inflammatory response in the walls in which the lipoproteins harden and form plaque within the arteries. There are three different types of atheromatous plaque. One type is simple cholesterol crystals that build up along the wall and narrow the diameter of the artery. The second type is called an atheroma, which is a nodular accumulation of flaky, yellow material (which is composed mostly of macrophages) in the center of large plaques at the lumen of the artery. The last type of atheromatous plaque is calcification of the outer base of more advanced lesions.

Atherosclerosis is caused by many factors, some of which can be controlled by the patient. Hypertension, obesity, smoking, diabetes, high cholesterol, and congenital heart disease can all be individual or combined causes of atherosclerosis in a patient. Depending on where in the body plaque builds up, symptoms may include angina, heart attack, severe pain, stroke, and/or dizziness.

Significance of Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis progresses slowly and is cumulative over time, beginning with macrophage infiltration into the artery. A fatty streak results and a lesion advances to eventually create an atheroma, as shown in the figure below. This continues to advances to create a larger, more complicated lesion. Over time, if the lesion is not treated, the plaque will suddenly rupture and form a thrombus that severely slows down, or even stops blood flow. This can lead to an infarction, which is death of the tissues feeding off of the artery within five minutes if it is not tended to immediately.

In the United States alone, atherosclerosis leads to the death of almost 15,000 people every year. It is also the cause of hospitalization for 20,000 patients per year and over 730,000 physician office visits per year.

atherosclerosis.jpg

Current Treatments
Current treatments include improvements in diet, cholesterol reduction medication, anticoagulate medication, blood pressure medication, surgical procedures and sometimes even gene therapy. Our medical device plans to make improvements upon the current surgical procedures, which are endarterectomy, angioplasty, bypass surgery, and thrombolytic therapy.